Why is the 3 step process in the Use of Force Framework considered continuous?

The 3 step process in the Use of Force Framework is regarded as continuous primarily because of the frequent situational changes that can occur during any engagement. Situations involving force are often dynamic and can evolve rapidly based on various factors such as the behavior of a suspect, the presence of bystanders, environmental conditions, and the overall context of the incident.

Officers must continuously assess these factors in real-time, which may necessitate adjustments to their use of force. This ongoing assessment and adjustment ensure that the response remains appropriate to the circumstances at hand, prioritizing de-escalation when possible and ensuring the safety of all individuals involved. Such a continuous process enhances the ability of security personnel to make swift and informed decisions in the field, aligning their actions with best practices and legal standards.

The other options, while relevant in different contexts, do not capture the essence of why the process is seen as continuous. Legal mandates are important but don’t directly influence the fluidity of situational dynamics. Similarly, accommodating all officer actions and standardizing training are significant but do not emphasize the need for constant situational awareness and adaptability that defines the continuous nature of the Use of Force Framework.