Which of the following is NOT a common consequence of trespassing?

The correct answer indicates that vacating the property is not a common consequence of trespassing. When individuals illegally enter a property, the typical responses from property owners or law enforcement are often proactive and legal in nature rather than requiring the trespasser to leave the premises directly.

Legal action usually follows incidents of trespassing, as property owners might pursue charges or seek civil remedies against those who violated their property rights. Injury to the trespasser can occur due to unsafe conditions, which can be an inherent risk of unauthorized entry. Increased security measures are often put in place as a response to trespassing incidents to deter future occurrences, making the property more secure.

In contrast, vacating the property is not a direct result of the act of trespassing itself. A trespasser may remain on the property until forcibly removed, often through legal means. Therefore, this option best captures a scenario that does not directly relate to the aftermath of trespassing incidents.