Which of the following is NOT a use of force option for security personnel?

In the context of security personnel, each option represents different strategies or techniques that can be employed to manage a situation. Notably, non-verbal gestures, while they can play a role in communication and de-escalation, do not constitute an official use of force option.

The primary role of security personnel is to prevent and respond to incidents using a spectrum of force options that include presence, communication, and potentially lethal force in life-threatening situations. Officer presence can deter criminal activity simply through the visibility of security personnel, while effective communication is vital in defusing tense situations. Lethal force, although it should only be a last resort, is recognized as a legitimate option under extreme circumstances where there is an imminent threat to life.

Non-verbal gestures may help in conveying messages or facilitating communication but lack the defined nature of a force option. They do not meet the criteria for the types of responses or actions that would be considered an official use of force, which is why this option does not fit within the broader framework of responses available to security personnel.